The market value of the micro strategy is lower than that of Bitcoin holdings "mNAV fell below 1". Will the stock price evaporate 60% from the high point and shake the MSTR currency hoarding strategy?

👤 transfer999@Julian 📅 2026-10-28 21:57:34

The market value of MicroStrategy fell below the value of its Bitcoin holdings, and mNAV fell below 1. Are investors wavering on the leveraged currency hoarding strategy?
(Preliminary summary: MicroStrategy no longer "crazy shopping", is this the reason for the decline of Bitcoin?)
(Background supplement: MicroStrategy spent US$45.6 million to increase its position in 397 coins BTC, the villain of Bitcoin: The buying intensity is too weak to prevent Bitcoin from continuing to fall)

The micro-strategy (Strategy), the dominant Bitcoin holdings, has reached a critical moment: the company’s stock price has fallen by more than 25% this year and continues to hit new lows in 2025 (it fell nearly 3% last night and is now at $224.61).

The current market value is approximately US$64.5 billion, which is lower than the 641,692 Bitcoins it holds, which is a book value of approximately US$65.7 billion based on US$102,500. mNAV, which represents market capitalization divided by Bitcoin’s net assets, fell below 1 for the first time, potentially ending the long-term premium pattern seen in the past.

The market value of micro-strategy is lower than that of Bitcoin holdings

mNAV fell below 1: Multiple factors attacked

The price of Bitcoin has recently backtested to US$100,000 several times, and MicroStrategy's stock price has fallen by nearly 60% from this year's high of US$542.99. The double pressure has caused the premium to evaporate.

In this context, some people in the market have also begun to worry that Strategy's continuous purchase of coins through debt issuance and capital increase may amplify leverage risks and dilute equity. In addition, 2027 The $1.01 billion in convertible bonds due in 2018 and the 10.5% preferred dividend of approximately $689 million per year are all regarded as subsequent cash flow burdens.

On the other hand, investor behavior is also changing. As more and more direct currency holding channels appear, Strategy is no longer the only "U.S. stock version of Bitcoin leverage tool". The risk of holding MSTR has increased than that of direct currency holdings, resulting in a weakening of buying incentives.

Three paths for the future: hoarding, repurchasing or hedging

At present, Strategy may face three options:

First, continue "buy and hold" and accumulate Bitcoin through further issuance of shares or bonds, at the expense of continued dilution of equity shares

Second, use part of the Bitcoin position to repurchase stocks and increase the price mNAV, but will reduce long-term exposure (the probability should be low, which is tantamount to abandoning the previous strategy)

Third, introduce derivatives hedging to balance leverage and volatility risks.

For investors, the mNAV discount is both a risk and an opportunity; if the discount expands, value investors may enter the market, but if the price of Bitcoin stagnates or falls again, MicroStrategy's high-leverage model may face more tests.

상표:
공유하다:
FB X YT IG
transfer999@Julian

transfer999@Julian

블록체인 및 암호자산 편집자, 다음에 중점을 둡니다.분석하다도메인 콘텐츠 분석 및 통찰력

논평 (10)

프랜시스 114며칠 전
동의합니다. 임계값이 낮으면 채택률이 높아집니다.
페이즐리 114며칠 전
Web3 생태건설에 대한 더 많은 콘텐츠를 기대합니다.
퍼시 114며칠 전
토큰 경제 모델 설계는 큰 과학입니다.
마커스 114며칠 전
산업주기는 격렬하게 변동하며 이는 장기 건설업체에게 도움이 되지 않습니다.
애디슨 114며칠 전
마지막으로 누군가 합의 메커니즘을 명확하게 설명했습니다.
도리스 114며칠 전
개발자 생태학적 건설이 초석이라고 잘 알려져 있습니다.
애비게일 115며칠 전
동의합니다. 블록체인 애플리케이션은 순환 고리를 돌파해야 합니다.
도리스 116며칠 전
기술과 감독은 오랫동안 경쟁할 것이라는 점에 동의합니다.
쿠퍼 122며칠 전
가스비는 정확히 얼마인가요? 왜 그렇게 불안정합니까?
사무엘 138며칠 전
킬러 애플리케이션이 없다는 점은 업계에서 가장 큰 난처함입니다.

댓글 추가

관련 내용

인기 콘텐츠